Business ethics, technology use, and workplace happiness: Gender-based differences
Abstract
This study investigates the relationship between business ethics and workplace happiness, explicitly examining the role of technology use as a potential mediator and the moderating effect of gender within organizational contexts in an emerging economy. Using a quantitative, cross-sectional, and non-experimental research design, data were collected from a sample of 367 employees working in Mexican organizations across diverse sectors. The proposed theoretical model was tested through covariance-based structural equation modelling (CB-SEM), complemented by multi-group analysis to explore gender-based differences in the structural relationships. The findings provide robust evidence that business ethics exerts a significant and positive effect on workplace happiness, with this relationship being notably stronger among women, thereby underscoring the relevance of ethical organizational climates for employee well-being. In contrast, technology use neither demonstrated a significant direct effect on workplace happiness nor functioned as a mediating mechanism between ethics and happiness, suggesting that technological tools alone are insufficient to enhance subjective well-being in the absence of a strong ethical foundation. These results indicate that, in emerging organizational contexts, ethical culture and values outweigh the instrumental role of technology in shaping employees’ happiness at work. From a theoretical perspective, the cross-sectional nature of the study constrains causal inference, highlighting the need for future longitudinal and cross-cultural research to assess temporal dynamics and contextual generalizability. Practically, the findings emphasize that organizations seeking to enhance workplace happiness should prioritize ethical leadership, fairness, and integrity, while adopting gender-sensitive approaches to digital transformation. Socially, fostering ethical organizational cultures may contribute to more inclusive, emotionally sustainable, and human-centered workplaces. Overall, this research offers original value by proposing and empirically validating an integrative model that links business ethics, technology use, and workplace happiness, incorporating gender as a moderating factor within the organizational behaviour literature.Copyright (c) 2026 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
1. Ahmad, N., & Zulkifli, A. M. (2022). Internet of Things (IoT) and the road to happiness. Digital Transformation and Society, 1(1), 66–94. https://doi.org/10.1108/dts-05-2022-0009
2. Al-Ameedee, S. M. M., & Moradi, M. (2023). The Effect of Ethics in Business on Happiness, Aggressiveness and Inconsistency of Efforts and Rewards. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(3), 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16030195
3. Alshammary, K. M. O., & Hilmi, M. F. (2024). Balancing Technology and Leadership: Implications for Employee Satisfaction in Saudi Arabian healthcare. International Journal of Religion, 5(5), 1083–1096. https://doi.org/10.61707/4fh2qf36
4. Andersson, C., Hallin, A., & Ivory, C. (2021). Unpacking the digitalisation of public services: Configuring work during automation in local government. Government Information Quarterly, 39(1), 101662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101662
5. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2013). La teoría de las demandas y los recursos laborales. Revista de Psicología Del Trabajo y de Las Organizaciones, 29(3), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.5093/tr2013a16
6. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
7. Bangun, Y. R., Pritasari, A., Widjaja, F. B., et al. (2021). Role of Happiness: Mediating digital technology and job performance among lecturers. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.593155
8. Bankins, S., & Formosa, P. (2023). The ethical implications of artificial intelligence (AI) for meaningful work. Journal of Business Ethics, 185(4), 725–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05339-7
9. Benson, J. K., Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 358. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392573
10. Böhm, S., Carrington, M., Cornelius, N., et al. (2022). Ethics at the centre of global and local challenges: Thoughts on the future of Business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 180(3), 835–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05239-2
11. Calabretta, G., Durisin, B., & Ogliengo, M. (2011). Uncovering the intellectual structure of research in Business Ethics: a journey through the history, the classics, and the pillars of Journal of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(4), 499–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0924-8
12. Carmine, S., & De Marchi, V. (2022). Reviewing Paradox Theory in Corporate Sustainability Toward a Systems Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 184(1), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05112-2
13. Castellanos-Redondo, S., Nevado-Peña, D., & Yañez-Araque, B. (2020). Ethics and happiness at work in the Spanish financial sector. Sustainability, 12(21), 9268. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219268
14. Cheah, J., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., et al. (2020). Convergent validity assessment of formatively measured constructs in PLS-SEM. SAGE Open, 10(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020948906
15. Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
16. Chenshu, Y., Arshad, M. A. bin, Wenyan, Y., & Mengjiao, Z. (2024). Exploring the Path to Employee Happiness: A Review of Employee Well-being Research. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v14-i3/20868
17. Choi, T., Kumar, S., Yue, X., et al. (2022). Disruptive Technologies and Operations Management in the Industry 4.0 Era and Beyond. Production and Operations Management, 31(1), 9–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13622
18. Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2007). Business Ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of Globalization. Available from: http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA80021898 (accessed on 23 October 2025).
19. Deniz, S. (2024). Effect of ethical leadership and employee voice on happiness at the workplace. Current Research in Social Sciences, 10(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.30613/curesosc.1384658
20. Deng, D., Xu, G., & Qin, C. (2023). Influence of employees’ perception of digital transformation meaning on work engagement and well-being. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 51(9), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.12623 h
21. Di Maddaloni, F., & Sabini, L. (2022). Very important, yet very neglected: Where do local communities stand when examining social sustainability in major construction projects? International Journal of Project Management, 40(7), 778–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.08.007
22. Dutta, D., & Mishra, S. K. (2023). Bots for mental health: the boundaries of human and technology agencies for enabling mental well-being within organizations. Personnel Review, 53(5), 1129–1156. https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-11-2022-0832
23. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Hong Kong: Sage.
24. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
25. Galvan-Vela, E., Ripoll, R. R., Altamirano, M. a. S., et al. (2024). El trinomio compromiso, satisfacción y justicia organizacional en el binomio felicidad e intención de rotar. Retos, 14(28), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.17163/ret.n28.2024.01
26. Gloor, P. A. (2022). Happimetrics: Leveraging AI to Untangle the Surprising Link Between Ethics, Happiness and Business Success. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803924021
27. Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., et al. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
28. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., et al. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Hong Kong: Pearson.
29. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., et al. (2019). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Hong Kong: Sage. https://doi.org/10.3926/oss.37
30. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., et al. (2013). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6
31. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
32. Hernández-Cuadra, E., & Fernández-Fernández, J. L. (2024). Ethics and compliance programs for a new business narrative: A Kohlberg-based moral valuing model for diagnosing commitment at the top. Business and Society Review, 129(1), 72–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12345
33. Herutomo, S., & Ginting, H. (2025). The Mediating Role of Employee Happiness in Digital Technology Adoption and its Impact on Performance and Work Culture in Coal Mining XYZ Company. Return: Study of Management, Economic and Bussines, 4(8), 655–676. https://doi.org/10.57096/return.v4i8.393
34. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
35. Karlsen, F., & Ytre-Arne, B. (2021). Intrusive media and knowledge work: how knowledge workers negotiate digital media norms in the pursuit of focused work. Information Communication & Society, 25(15), 2174–2189. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2021.1933561
36. Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York, NY, USA: Guilford Press.
37. Kortsch, T., Rehwaldt, R., Schwake, M. E., et al. (2022). Does remote work make people happy? Effects of flexibilization of work location and working hours on happiness at work and affective commitment in the German banking sector. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(15), 9117. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159117
38. Laasch, O., Moosmayer, D. C., & Antonacopoulou, E. P. (2022). The Interdisciplinary Responsible Management Competence Framework: An integrative review of ethics, responsibility, and sustainability competences. Journal of Business Ethics, 187(4), 733–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05261-4
39. Lu, Z., Li, P., Li, Q., et al. (2024). To be, or not to be, happy? That’s the question: a study on three levels of the digital divide and individual happiness in China. Information Technology & People, 37(4), 1802–836. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-04-2022-0278
40. Luna-Arocas, R., & Danvila-del-Valle, I. (2022). The impact of talent management on ethical behavior and intention to stay in the organization. Journal of Management & Organization, 30(5), 1392–1407. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2022.64
41. Martínez-Arvizu, O., Salazar-Altamirano, M., Hernández-Arteaga, L., et al. (2025). La influencia del estrés laboral y la felicidad en el trabajo sobre los hábitos de consumo: un análisis en el contexto mexicano. Revista Empresa Y Humanismo, 243–272. https://doi.org/10.15581/015.xxviii.1.243-272
42. Martínez-Falcó, J., Sánchez-García, E., Marco-Lajara, B., et al. (2024). Enhancing employee wellbeing and happiness management in the wine industry: unveiling the role of green human resource management. BMC Psychology, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01703-y
43. Martínez-Peláez, R., Ochoa-Brust, A., Rivera, S., et al. (2023). Role of digital transformation for achieving sustainability: mediated role of stakeholders, key capabilities, and technology. Sustainability, 15(14), 11221. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411221
44. Mercader, V. (2019). Educación inspiradora: conocimiento solucionador y aplicable con felicidad. Journal of Management and Business Education, 2(2), 160–188. https://doi.org/10.35564/jmbe.2019.00
45. Mercader, V., Galván-Vela, E., Ravina-Ripoll, R., et al. (2021). A Focus on Ethical Value under the Vision of Leadership, Teamwork, Effective Communication and Productivity. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(11), 522. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14110522
46. Mercader, V., Salazar-Altamirano, M. A., Martínez-Arvizu, O. J., et al. (2025). Development and psychometric validation of the work attitudinal and values ethics scale (WAVE). International Journal of Ethics and Systems. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-06-2025-0313
47. Mettler, T. (2024). The connected workplace: Characteristics and social consequences of work surveillance in the age of datification, sensorization, and artificial intelligence. Journal of Information Technology, 39(3), 547–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268396223120253
48. Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192–222. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.3.192
49. Mu, H., Xu, J., & Chen, S. (2023). The impact of corporate social responsibility types on happiness management: a stakeholder theory perspective. Management Decision, 62(2), 591–613. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-02-2023-0267
50. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., et al. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
51. Rabetino, R., Kohtamäki, M., & Federico, J. S. (2020). A (Re)view of the Philosophical Foundations of Strategic Management. International Journal of Management Reviews, 23(2), 151–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12244
52. Ranga, M. (2023). Contemporary Business and Ethics. Journal of Organisational Studies and Innovation, 10(1), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.51659/josi.22.168
53. Ravina-Ripoll, R., Balderas-Cejudo, A., Núñez-Barriopedro, E., et al. (2023). Are chefs happiness providers? Exploring the impact of organizational support, intrapreneurship and interactional justice from the perspective of happiness management. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science, 34, 100818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgfs.2023.100818
54. Ravina-Ripoll, R. R., Romero-Rodríguez, L. M., & Ahumada-Tello, E. (2022). Guest editorial: Happiness management: key factors for sustainability and organizational communication in the age of Industry 4.0. Corporate Governance, 22(3), 449–457. https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-05-2022-576
55. Rokhman, W., Atieq, M. Q., Ahamed, F., et al. (2025). Exploring workplace happiness: Islamic leadership and work ethics driving engagement and helping behaviour. RMIT University. Journal contribution. https://doi.org/10779/rmit.29333306
56. Şahin, M., & Aybek, E. (2020). Jamovi: An Easy to Use Statistical Software for the Social Scientists. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 6(4), 670–692. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.661803
57. Salazar-Altamirano, M. A., Martínez-Arvizu, O. J., Galván-Vela, E., et al. (2025). IA como facilitadora de criatividade e bem-estar em estudantes de negócios: Uma abordagem multigrupo entre universidades públicas e privadas. Encontros Bibli: Revista Eletrônica de Biblioteconomia e Ciência Da Informação, 30, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2025.e103485
58. Sadeghi, S. (2024). Employee Well-being in the Age of AI: Perceptions, Concerns, Behaviors, and Outcomes (Version 1). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2412.04796
59. Stenseng, F., Steinsholt, I. B., Hygen, B. W., et al. (2023). Running to get “lost”? Two types of escapism in recreational running and their relations to exercise dependence and subjective well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1035196
60. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Hong Kong: Pearson.
61. Tay, L., Batz-Barbarich, C., Yang, L., et al. (2023). Well-being: the Ultimate Criterion for Organizational Sciences. Journal of Business and Psychology, 38(6), 1141–1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-023-09908-5
62. Thelen, P. D., & Formanchuk, A. (2021). Culture and internal communication in Chile: Linking ethical organizational culture, transparent communication, and employee advocacy. Public Relations Review, 48(1), 102137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102137
63. Wallace, L. G., & Sheetz, S. D. (2014). The adoption of software measures: A technology acceptance model (TAM) perspective. Information & Management, 51(2), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.12.003
64. Weiss, J. W. (2021). Business Ethics, Seventh Edition: A Stakeholder and Issues Management Approach. Oakland, CA, USA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
65. Wolfgruber, D., & Einwiller, S. (2024). Culture matters: Cultural variability in corporate codes of conduct as a means to foster organizational legitimacy. Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility. 34(4), 1642–1661. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12733
66. Yaroğlu, A. C. (2025). Organizational reflections of the relationship between artificial ıntelligence and emotional ıntelligence in the context of phenomenology and Cartesian dualism. International Journal of Organizational Analysis. 33(10), 3878–3895. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-10-2024-4892
